OD Lecture Notes

Class 1, 1/25: Course Overview & Introduction to Organizational Change
Class Lecture Slides 01

managerial innovation

Exploitive authoritative systems
Benevolent authoritative systems
Consultative systems
Participative group systems

Blake and Mouton’s Grid OD: an individual’s style can be described according to his concern for production and concern for people. (Note: concern for production includes productive tasks, developing ideas – not limited to things; also includes people). There are 81 possible leadership styles ranging from 1,1 to 9,9. A 1,9 manager has a low concern for production and a high concern for people. A 9,9 style is the most effective

How to facilitate, lead, and manage change:
– change can be self-initiated
– change can be forced upon us
– change can bring threats
– change can lead to opportunities

Organizational Development Defined:

  • OD is a planned process of change in an organization’s culture through the utilization of behavioral science technology, research, and theory (Burke).
  • OD refers to a long-range effort to improve an org’s problem-solving capabilities and its ability to cope with changes in its external environment with the help of external or internal behavioral-scientist consultants (French).
  • OD is an effort planned, organization-wide, and managed from the top, to increase organization’s effectiveness and health through planned interventions in the org’s “processes,” using behavioral science knowledge (Beckhard).
  • OD is a systems-wide process of data collection, diagnosis, action planning, intervention, and evaluation aimed at: enhancing congruence between org structure, process, strategy, people, and culture; developing new and creative org solutions; and developing the org’s self-renewing capacity. It occurs through collaboration of org members working with a change agent using behavioral science theory, research, and technology (Beers).
  • OD is a systemwide application and transfer of behavioral science knowledge to the planned development, improvement, and reinforcement of the strategies, structures, and processes that lead to org effectiveness.

Five Systems of OD Practice:
– Laboratory Training (1950s-now)
– Action Research/Survey Feedback (1950s-now)
– Normative Approaches (1960s-now)
– Quality of Work Life (1970s-now)
– Strategic Change (1980s-now)

Open Systems Model: org’s exist in an environment with the other companies around it. instead of closed system which is Taylor’s view – an org is where it’s address is, in a vacuum.

Open Systems Model Diagram looks like this… Org’s have inputs (environment, resources, history) which shapes its strategy. Which leads to interactions of formal org, informal org, tasks, and individuals. Which leads to outputs of individual behavior, group behavior, and org functioning. Outputs also provide feedback for inputs and transformative processes. IPO Model: Input-Processes-Output

Assumptions about Org’s:
– Orgs are dynamic entities
– Behavior occurs at multiple levels for multiple reasons
– Orgs are open systems (a set of interrelated components that conduct transactions with a larger environment)

Lewin’s Change Model:
Unfreezing -> Movement -> Refreezing
(start, stop, start, stop fashion). Change happens when having a snapshot. This is the most common view of change. Challenge of it is that this process isn’t that simple. Argue that “unfreezing” is really a process of multiple small changes

Action Research Model: with a feedback loop. You see a problem and gather data, then you make a joint diagnosis with the client to determine the course of action. Repeat and repeat to get it right.

Positive Model: Initiate the inquiry, then inquire into best practices, discover themes, envision a preferred future then design and deliver ways to create the future. Keep the loop going back to inquiring about the best practices

Planned Change Models:
– enter into a contract
– diagnosis
– planning and implementing change
– evaluating and instituting change

The Water of Ayole

– have to get into the fabric of the organization to make change stick
– can’t tell someone what to do
– change creates other changes

Final notes:
– change is not a one-shot deal
– people may want to change but there are systemic factors that prevent them from changing
– Orgs are stubborn: managers have strong beliefs that are difficult to change

Guinea Worm Update


OD: a process that applies a broad range of behavioral science knowledge and practices to help orgs achieve greater effectiveness

OD applies changes in the strategy. It is based on application. Managing planned change. Design, implementation, and subsequent reinforcement of change.

Oriented to improving org effectiveness, which is measured in three dimensions: adaptability, high financial and technical performance, and satisfied and loyal customers/shareholders.

OD is dif from change management in the underlying value orientation. Behavioral science plays a predominant role. OD is more narrowly focused too.

Changes: globalization, information technology, managerial innovation

History of OD:

(1) Kurt Lewin (1946) of MIT held laboratory training. They learned: (1) feedback and group interaction was a rich learning experience; (2) “group building” had potential to work in back home situations.

(2) Kurt Lewin, John Collier, and William Whyte did action research. This is where Rensis Likert created Likert scale.

(3) Normative background led to Blake and Mouton’s Grid: an individual’s style can be described according to his concern for production and concern for people. (Note: concern for production includes productive tasks, developing ideas – not limited to things; also includes people). There are 81 possible leadership styles ranging from 1,1 to 9,9. A 1,9 manager has a low concern for production and a high concern for people. A 9,9 style is the most effective.
– Exploitive authoritative systems
– Benevolent authoritative systems
– Consultative systems
– Participative group systems


The two foremost barriers to excellence: planning and communication

Class 2, 2/1: The Role of the Consultant & Entering/Contracting Strategies
Class Lecture Slides 02

The OD Practitioner
– Internal or external
– other professionals may apply OD practices
– managers and admin apply OD daily, whether they are aware or not

Competencies of an OD Practitioner:
– Intrapersonal skills (need self-awareness)
– Interpersonal skills (ability to work with others and groups)
– General consultation skills (can manage the process)
– Organization development theory (knowledge of the change process)

Primary function is to build trust and confidence

Role Demands on OD Practitioner:
– Position (internal vs. external)
– Marginality (ability to straddle boundaries)
– Functional demands (emotional intelligence)
– Use of knowledge and expertise

Schein, 1990:

Three Models of Helping:
– Provide expert information
– Playing doctor
– Process consultation

Ethics – Professional Guidelines:
– Find out what resources you can use in your analysis? What info is off limits?
– Confidentiality: what info is confidential?
– Informed consent: participation should be voluntary and should not have adverse consequences.

Ethical dilemmas:
– misrepresentation
– misuse of data
– coercion
– value and goal conflicts
– technical ineptness

The Entering Process:
– Determining the relevant client (where is the target of change?)
– Clarifying the organizational issues (presenting a problem, symptoms)
– Selecting a consultant

Determining the relevant client:
– Those who will impact change
– Those who will resist change
– Who is needed to be a part of the change
– Note: these may not be the people you think at the onset of the project

Elements of an Effective Proposal:
– Goals: descriptive, clear, concise
– Recommended Action Plan: description of 1) diagnosis, 2) data analysis process, 3) feedback process, 4) action-planning process
– Specification of Responsibilities: what will each party be held accountable for?
– Strategy for Achieving the Desired State: provide change strategies (education/training, political influence, structural interventions, and confrontation of resistance)
– Fees, terms, and conditions

Develop a contract:
– Establishes phases of the project (can be formal or informal)
– Establishes the expectations of the client (ground rules, confidentiality, deliverable deadlines, who the team will have access to)
– May be verbal or written, but must be mutually agreed upon

Elements of an effective contract:
– Mutual expectations are clear (outcomes and deliverables, publishing cases and results, involvement of stakeholders)
– Time and resources (access to clients, managers, members, and info)
– Ground rules (confidentiality)

Outline of a contract:
– Statement of the problem
– Expected process of the diagnosis
– Expected outcome from the diagnosis
– Roles, expectations, resources, ethics
– Time-line/Gant chart

Class 3, 2/8: Diagnosing Organizations
Class Lecture Slides 03

Open Systems model is hard to prove, as one thing is dependent upon another is dependent upon another, so difficult/impossible to test empirically. Have to look at top down and bottom up.

General Model of Planned Change:

  1. Entering and Contracting
  2. Diagnosing
  3. Planning and Implementing Change
  4. Evaluating and Institutionalizing Change

People Pulse is the HR term for ESM

The model of planned change above is very simplistic. There is a lot of unknown that comes from change.

Data Collection and Feedback Cycle:

  • Collecting Data
  • Analyzing Data
  • Feeding Back Data
  • Follow-up

Diagnosis is a collaborative process between organizational members and the OD consultant to collect pertinent information, analyze it, and draw conclusions for action planning and intervention.

Successful diagnosis depends on…

  • Your ability to collect appropriate information/to understand what is really happening in the organization
  • Your ability to facilitate organizational action
  • Your ability to direct energy toward org problem solving

When giving an effective diagnosis, you should choose the right data/information to pay attention to. Is it relevant/meaningful? It is understandable/easy to interpret? Is it consistent/are there patterns? Is it descriptive/can you link to examples? Is it verifiable/is the data valid and accurate? Is it timely/current data? Is it comparative – what is similar/different from other successful firms?

Whenever you can show the gap between where people are and where they want to be, it is very motivating. Show comparative numbers – get a benchmark. You want to be the Ikea of furniture? Well, they’re moving 2000 units per day, you’re moving 200. Gap!

The Open Systems Model – it is in an environment and there is constant feedback. IPO Model – Input, Process, Output. Inputs (information, energy, people) – Process/Transformations (social component, technological component). Outputs (goods, services, ideas).

Properties of Systems:

  • Inputs, Transformations, and Outputs
  • Boundaries (departmental, company, legal, international)
  • Feedback
  • Equifinality (more than one way to skin a cat)
  • Alignment

Transactional Cost Economics – how can we tell where one company ends and another begins?

Competitive Advantage comes from alignment of internal components.

The key to effective diagnosis is to know what to look for at each organizational level and to recognize how the levels affect each other.


Inputs (general environment, industry structure) – Design Components (technology, strategy, structure, HR systems, measurement systems: all lead to culture) – Outputs (org effectiveness)

To understand environment, need to know how dense the market is.

Strategy – is your strategy to be Innovative, cost-cutting, quality, and one other thing…

The strategy (in the design components) directly impacts the outcome (whether the org is effective).

In alignment, make sure the design components fit with the inputs. Are they internally consistent? Do they fit and mutually support each other?

Organizational Environments and Inputs…

Environmental Types:

  • General Environment
  • Task Environment and Industry Structure
  • Rate of Change and Complexity
  • Enacted Environment (perceived environment)

Environmental Dimensions

  • Information Uncertainty
  • Resource Dependency (number of potential suppliers determines how dependent one is)

Strategy: the way an organization uses its resources (human, economic, or technical) to gain and sustain a competitive advantage.

Technology: the way an organization converts inputs into products and services.

Structure: how attention and resources are focused on task accomplishment.

Organizational Design Components

— Human Resource Systems: the mechanism for selecting, developing, appraising, and rewarding org members

— Measurement Systems: methods of gathering, assessing, and disseminating information on all the activities of groups and individuals in organizations.

— Culture: the set of shared beliefs, expectations, value, and norms that shape attitudes and behavior in organizations. It emerges from the shared history of a stable social group. Varies in strength and intensity. It is essentially the “right” way to behave, think, or feel.

Functions that Culture Serves:

  • Sense making (enables people to understand decisions and goals)
  • Social glue (provides a basis for promoting similarities among people creating common bonds)
  • Organizational identity (highlights org characteristics that distinguish it from others)
  • Facilitates commitment (creates a place where people want to stay and contribute)
  • Control mechanism (provides guidelines about appropriate and inappropriate behaviors)

Basic assumptions (what you take for granted/preconscious) -> what you are told -> what you observe. Assumptions are most visible when challenged (about reality, time, space, human nature, relationships) lead to values that you’re told about leads to what you observe (artifacts, objects with cultural meaning, ceremonies, rites, stories, language and symbols; difficult to interpret without other levels)

Outputs: Org Performance (profits, profitability, stock price), Productivity (cost/employee, cost/unit, error rates, quality); Stakeholder Satisfaction (market share, employee satisfaction, regulation compliance)

Alignment: diagnosis involves understanding each of the parts in the model and then assessing how the elements of the strategic orientation align with each other and with the inputs. Org effectiveness is likely to be high when there is good alignment.


Inputs (organizational design) – Design Components (goal clarity, task structure, group functioning, group composition, performance norms) – Outputs (group effectiveness)

Goal Clarity: extent to which group understands its objectives

Task Structure: the way the group’s work is designed

Team Functioning: the quality of group dynamics among members

Group Composition: the characteristics of group members

Performance Norms: the unwritten rules that govern behavior

Hackman’s Model for Group Process: Is the group learning? Did they produce? Are the individual members thriving and flourishing?


Inputs (organizational design, group design, personal traits) – Design Components (skill variety, task identity, autonomy, task significance, feedback about results) – Outputs (individual effectiveness)

Meaningfulness of work has three components: skill variety, task identity, task significance.

Skill Variety: the range of activities and abilities required for task completion

Task Identity: the ability to see the whole piece of work

Task Significance: the impact of work on others

Autonomy: the amount of freedom and discretion

Feedback and Results: Knowledge of task performance outcomes

Quick Review for Diagnosis:
– Who is the OD Practitioner?
– Why is the practitioner here?
– Who does the practitioner work for?
– What does the practitioner want and why?
– How will my confidentiality be protected?
– Who will have access to the data?
– Can the practitioner be trusted?

Data Collection Feedback Cycle: Planning to Collect Data -> Collecting Data -> Analyzing Data -> Feeding Back Data -> Following Up

Sampling – population vs. sample; importance of sample size; process of sampling; types of samples (random, convenience)

Advantages of Questionnaires: responses can be quantified and summarized; large samples and large quantities of data; relatively inexpensive

Problems with Questionnaires: little opportunity for empathy with subjects; predetermined questions; over interpretation of data is possible; response bias possible

Advantages of Interviews: adaptive; “rich” data; empathic; builds rapport

Problems with Interviews: relatively inexpensive; bias in interviewer responses; coding and interpretation can be difficult; self-report bias possible

Types of Questions
– Experience and behavior questions
– Opinion and value questions
– Feeling questions
– Knowledge questions
– Background/demographic questions

Examples of Acceptable Questions
– Descriptive/Linear questions: Please tell me what you do in your job?
– Narrative questions: Can you please tell me how you came to get the job?
– Structural questions: So what are all the stages involved in the process of making different kinds of coffee?
– Contrast questions: What are the main differences that distinguish a good day at work from a bad day at work?
– Evaluative questions: How do you feel after a bad day at work?
– Systematic questions: Circular -> What do you think your supervisor thinks about how you do your job? Comparative -> How do you think your life would be different if you worked somewhere else, like at CBTL or Starbucks?
– Prompts and probes: Can you tell me more about that? What do you mean by fast-paced?

Advantages of Observations: collects data on actual behavior rather than just reports of data; real time, not retrospective; adaptive

Problems with Observations: coding and interpretation difficulties; sampling inconsistencies; observer bias and questionable reliability; cost can be expensive

Advantages of Unobtrusive Measures: non-reactive, no response bias; high face validity; easily quantified

Problems with Unobtrusive Measures: access and retrieval difficulties; validity concerns; coding and interpretation difficulties

Analysis Techniques

Qualitative Tools: Content Analysis; Force-field Analysis

Quantitative Tools: Descriptive Statistics; Measures of Association (eg correlation); Difference Tests

Class 4, 2/15: Mechanistic/Bureaucratic
Class Lecture Slides 04

Mechanical View of Orgs

  • Fredrick the Great of Prussia (1740-1786) inherited an army and introduced ranks, uniforms, common language, training and drills.
  • Adam Smith (19th Century) Division of Labor
  • Max Weber (19th Century) observed parallels between the mechanization of industry and bureaucratic forms of organization.

Classic Management Perspectives: Fayol, Mooney, and Urwick – management is a process of planning, organization, command, management techniques, and other means for stressing rational planning and control.

Scientific Management: Frederick Taylor (1915), and engineer by training, realized workers were not working their machines or themselves as hard as they could.

Principles of Scientific Management:

  • Shift all responsibility for the organization of the work from the worker to the manager (split the brain and the hands)
  • Use scientific methods to determine the efficient way to work
  • Select the best person to perform the job
  • Train the worker to work efficiently
  • Monitor worker performance to achieve desired performance

Organizational Structure: defines how job tasks are formally divided, grouped, and coordinated.

Work Specialization (division of labor): describes the degree to which activities in the org are subdivided into separate jobs. Benefits: greater efficiency, lower costs. Costs: human costs when carried too far; job enlargement as a solution.

Departmentalization: basis by which jobs are grouped together so that common tasks can be coordinated. (similar to work specialization, but think functions – accounting, HR, etc). Common bases: functional, departments, geography, process, customer.

Chain of Command: unbroken line of authority that extends from the top of the org to the lowest echelon and clarifies who reports to whom. This is the height of the org chart.

Span of Control: the number of employees a manager is expected to effectively and efficiently direct. Determines the number of levels and managers an or has. Trend is toward wider spans of control; wider span depends on knowledgeable employees; affects the speed of communication and decision making. This is the width of the org chart.

Centralization and Decentralization: the degree to which decision making is concentrated at a single point in the org is centralization. Only includes formal authority; highly centralized when top managers make all the decisions; decentralized when front line employees and supervisors make decisions; trend is toward increased decentralization.

Formalization: degree to which jobs within the organization are standardized. Formal = minimum discretion over what is to be done, when it is done, and how; Informal = freedom to act is necessary.

Common Organizational Designs

Simple Structure: difficult to maintain this design in anything other than small orgs; low degree of departmentalization; wide span of control; authority centralized in a single person; little formalization.

Bureaucracy: highly routine operating tasks achieved through specialization. Formal rules and regulations; centralized authority; narrow spans of control; tasks grouped by functional departments; decision making follows the chain of command.

Matrix Structure: combines two forms of departmentalization (ie: functional and product); dual chain of command; advantages: facilitates coordination and efficiency; disadvantages: possible confusion, fosters power struggles and stress.

The Mechanistic Model: high specialization, rigid departmentalization, clear chain of command, narrow spans of control, centralization, high formalization.

The Organic Model: cross-functional teams, cross-hierarchical teams, free flow of information, wide spans of control, decentralization, low formalization.

Comparing Organic and Mechanistic

Organic: employees contribute to the common task of the org; tasks are adjusted and redefined through employee interactions; there is less hierarchy of authority and control and there are few rules; knowledge and control of tasks are located anywhere in the org; communication is horizontal.

Mechanistic: tasks are broken down into specialized, separate parts; tasks are rigidly defined; strict authority and control and there are many rules; knowledge and control are centralized at the top of the organization; communication is vertical.

Mechanistic approach is most appropriate when precision, safety, and accountability are at a premium. Ex: surgical wards, aircraft maintenance, or finance offices. This approach works best when there is a straightforward task to perform, when the environment is stable enough to ensure the products produced will be appropriate ones, when one wishes to produce the same product time and time again, when precision is at a premium, when the human machine parts are compliant and behave as intended. Weaknesses: difficulty adapting to change, employees unlikely to take initiative, people justify mistakes by saying they are “obeying orders,” lack of pride can emerge because people aren’t feeling empowered, competition can arise from the division of labor, employees lose opportunities for growth.

Top-Down Change: this is not simply the CEO, it is a management team making a push to change. The nature of today’s work environment (ie: need for speed, shifts in corporate culture) require fundamental shifts that need to come from the top. Pushes people toward chance, cuts across intra-org boundaries, and requires buy-in from all levels. People at the lower levels don’t have the perspective, resources, or power to make system-wide changes. Leaders still have control over rewards and process. Advantages: from the view of the top, they can see all aspects, not just the view of a single department; process visible and formal authority should be a natural point of projections.

Bottom Up Change: has to pull or attract people to change, starts with a champion who is passionate about the cause, lets ideas and suggestions come from below. More perspectives could be considered, resulting in innovative alternatives.

Major Strategic Decisions for Rewarding Employees

  1. What to pay employees
  2. How to pay individual employees
  3. What benefits to offer
  4. How to construct employee recognition programs

What to Pay: Need to establish a pay structure, balancing between internal equity (worth of the job to the org) and external equity (the external competitiveness of an org’s pay relative to elsewhere in the industry). This is a strategic decision with trade-offs.

How to Pay: Variable-Pay programs –

  • piece-rate pay (workers are paid a fixed sum for each unit of production completed)
  • merit-based pay (pay based on individual performance appraisal ratings)
  • bonuses (rewards employees for recent performance)
  • skill-based pay (paid based on job title or rank; doesn’t address the level of performance)
  • profit-sharing plans (org wide programs that distribute $$ based on established formula designed around profitability)
  • gainsharing (compensation based on sharing of gains from improved productivity)
  • employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) (plans in which employees acquire stock, often at below-market prices)


Class 5, 2/22: Designing Interventions and Strategic Change
Class Lecture Slides 05

An intervention is a set of sequenced and planned actions or events intended to help the organization increase its effectiveness. They are designed to resolve specific problems and improve areas of org functioning.

Effective interventions are relevant to the needs of the organization. They contain valid information, free and informed choice, and internal commitment. Members should take ownership over the intervention and be responsible for implementation.

Assessing Change:
– Readiness for change (sensitivity to change, dissatisfaction with the status quo, crisis that creates urgency)
– Resistance to change (potential losses from change?)
– Urgency of change (how quickly is it needed?)
– Magnitude of change (how major of a change is required?)

Two approaches to change: cognitive (evaluative) and affective (emotional).

In cognitive, there is both the individual and collective. People will be ready for change if there’s a discrepancy and they believe change is needed. They also need to believe that change is appropriate. Also need to believe in efficacy – that there is a capability to implement the change initiative. Finally, they need principal support – a belief that the org will provide support for the change.

We know more about cognitive responses to change than affective. Affective is the emotional inclination to accept, embrace, and adopt a particular plan to purposefully alter the status quo.

Change readiness: beliefs, attitudes, and intentions regarding the extent to which changes are needed and the org’s capacity to successfully undertake those changes

Change readiness is a multi-level phenomenon. How are the levels related to one another?

Resistance to Change

  • Lack of understanding
  • Don’t believe that the direction of change makes sense for the org
  • Lack of trust in top management
  • The feeling of urgency that change is necessary is not strong
  • Low tolerance for change
  • Desire to lose the “way things are now”

Dealing with Resistance to Change:

  • Education and Communication: where there is a lack of accurate information
  • Participation and Involvement: when initiators need more information and there is resistance
  • Facilitation and Support: challenges with adjustment
  • Negotiation and Agreement: when one group may lose out in the change and may resist
  • Manipulation and Co-optation: when other options don’t work or cost too much
  • Explicit and Implicit Coercion: when speed is needed and initiators have a lot of power

When should you use each strategy?

When you need fast change, it should be clearly planned, needs little involvement from others, and attempts to overcome the resistance.

Slower change is not clearly planned at the beginning, needs lots of involvement from others, and attempts to minimize resistance.

Fast Change (on the left) ——————————— Slower Change (on the right)

Situational Factors That Cannot Be Ignored:

  1. The position of the initiator vis a vis the resisters, especially with regards to power (stronger the initiator’s position, more one can more to the left
  2. The amount and kind of resistance (greater the resistance, move to right)
  3. The person who has the relevant data for designing the change and the energy for implementing it (if info needed, more one moves to the right)
  4. The stakes involved (greater urgency, the more one moves to the left)

From a worker’s perspective – front line employees tend to be cynical about change. Many believe that management is lying to them. They don’t trust that senior management is concerned about the interests of the employees. However, many workers feel an affinity to their immediate supervisor.

Mistakes made when communicating interventions:
– Not communicating
– Communicating values (we’re a family company, but then people get laid off)
– Communicating using big meetings, videos, publications

Change should be communicated:
– Involve frontline supervisors
– Communicate facts
– Communicate face to face
– Through front line supervisors in small groups

Intervention Targets:

Human Process Interventions: what systems can make the organization go?

– Process consultation and team building
– Third-party interventions (conflict resolution)
– Organization confrontation meeting
– Intergroup relationships
– Large-group interventions

Technostructural Interventions: how to divide and coordinate work?

– Structural design
– Downsizing
– Reengineering
– Parallel structures
– High involvement organizations
– Top quality management
– Work design

Human Resources Management Interventions: how to attract, select, and retain talent?

– Goal setting
– Performance appraisal
– Reward systems
– Coaching and mentoring
– Career planning and development
– Management and leadership
– Managing work force diversity
– Employee wellness programs

Strategic Interventions: how will they compete and with who?

– Transformational Change (integrated strategic change, organization design, culture change)
– Continuous Change (mergers & acquisitions, alliances & networks)
– Transorganizational Change (self-designing orgs, org learning and knowledge management, built to change orgs)

Organizational Design Model

Look at the strategic fit between organizational strategy and organizational design. The design fit includes: management & information systems, HR practices, structure, and work design.

Mechanistic and Organic Design

– Strategy: mechanistic design (cost minimization); organic design (innovation)

– Structure: mechanistic design (formal/hierarchical, functional); organic design (flat, lean, and flexible; matrix, process, and network)

– Work design: mechanistic design (traditional jobs, traditional work groups); organic design (enriched jobs, self-managed teams)

– HR Practices: mechanistic design (selection to fit job, up-front training, standard reward mix, pay for performance and individual merit, job-based pay); organic design (selection to fit org, continuous training and development, individual choice rewards, pay for performance and business success, skill-based pay)

– Management and Information Systems: mechanistic design (command and control; closed, exclusive, centralized information); organic design (employee involvement; open, inclusive, distributed information)

Organization Design Application Stages: (1) Clarify the Design Focus; (2) Designing the Org; (3) Implementing the Design

Culture Change Application Stages: (1) Establish a clear strategic vision; (2) Get top-management commitment; (3) Model culture change at the highest level; (4) Modify the org to support change; (5) Select and socialize newcomers; downsize deviants; (6) Develop ethical and legal sensitivity

7 S Framework: Everything is connected – Structure, Strategy, Skills, Staff, Style, Systems, Shared Values

Star Model: Strategy affects (1) People; (2) Rewards; (3) Management Processes; (4) Structure; (5) Work Process/Capabilities. This in turn shapes behavior which affects performance and culture

Looking at Southwest, there’s a Cost-Reduction Strategy:
– Explicit job analysis, fixed and narrow job responsibilities
– Minimal risk taking activity
– Minimal recruitment and selection procedures
– Narrow career paths (expertise and efficiency)
– Minimal socialization, training, and development
– High concern for outputs and results
– Short-term, results-orientated, remedial appraisals
– Pay based on market equity

Quality Strategy
– Explicit job analysis, broad job responsibilities
– Explicit job descriptions
– Narrow career path (expertise and quality)
– Socialization, continuous, and extensive training
– High concern for process
– Medium to long-term, appraisal of behavior and results
– Mixed individual and group evaluation criteria, employee participation
– Pay based on internal equity, emphasis on job security

Innovation Strategy
– Less explicit job analysis, broad responsibilities
– Less explicit job descriptions
– Broad career paths
– High creativity and high risk taking activity
– Minimal socialization, training will vary
– Developmental, long-term appraisals
– Mixed individual and group evaluation criteria
– Pay based on internal quality, but perks and incentives are given

7s Framework:
– Strategy: How will they create unique value? What are sources of non-imitable competitive advantage?
– Structure: How are tasks and people specialized and divided? Use of teams?
– Systems: What formal processes are used to manage the organization?
– Staffing: Who is hired, selected, retained?
– Skills: What are the unique competencies of employees, systems, management, technology?
– Style: What is the leadership style of top management? Does it breed trust?
– Shared Values: What values are held in common and provide a sense of purpose?

Lessons from using the 7s Framework: (1) Change agents make choices focused on these 7 key aspects of organizations; (2) Each is linked to one another and neglecting one can reduce the successfulness of the change strategy; (3) Imitation is often a challenge because not all of the 7s’ can be imitated to get the “right” combination

Dimensions of Relational Coordination:
– Frequent and timely communication
– Problem-solving
– Helping
– Shared goals
– Shared knowledge
– Mutual respect

Environment shapes orgs. Strategy shapes environment. Strategy shapes org.

Class 6, 2/29: Human Relations
Class Lecture Slides 06

Employee Involvement (EI) seeks to increase members’ input into decision that affect organization performance and employee well-being. It is the broad term for diverse approaches to gain greater participation in relevant workplace decisions.

EI Can Change:

  • Power: extent to which influence and authority are pushed down into the organization
  • Information: extent to which relevant information is shared with members
  • Knowledge and skills: extent to which members have relevant skills and knowledge and opportunities to gain them
  • Rewards: extent to which opportunities for internal and external rewards are tied to effectiveness

IPO Model with EI and Productivity: Employee Involvement Intervention -> leads to -> Improved Communication and Coordination; Improved Motivation; Improved Capabilities -> leads to -> Improved Productivity.
—Note: as psychologists we are looking at the underlying mechanism driving the outcome (the P)

Looking at a country like Thailand (high power distance, collectivistic), the model may not apply

Secondary Effects of EI on Productivity. An EI intervention lead to greater productivity in that it leads to well-being and satisfaction which leads to attraction and retention which also leads to productivity.

Job Characteristics Theory

High Involvement Organization Features:
– Flat, lean organizational structures
– Enriched work designs
– Open information systems
– Sophisticated selection and career systems
– Extensive training programs
– Advanced rewards systems
– Participatively designed personnel practices
– Conducive physical layouts

Approaches to Work Design

I. Engineering: Traditional Jobs and Groups
– High specification and routinization
– Low task variety and autonomy

II. Motivational: Enriched Jobs
– High task variety and autonomy
– Feedback of results

III. Sociotechnical: Self-Managing Teams
– Control over total task
– Multi-skilled, flexible, and self-regulation

I. Designing Work for Technical and Personal. Must look at Technical Factors and Personal Need Factors.

Technical factors include: (1) Technical Interdependence: the extent to which cooperation among workers is required. (2) Technical Uncertainty: the amount of information processing and decision making among workers necessary to do the work.

Personal need factors include: (1) Social needs: the desire for significant social relationships. (2) Growth needs: the desire for personal accomplishment, learning, and development.

II. Enriched Jobs: the core job characteristics are Skill Variety, Task Identity, and Task Significance (I) leading to critical psychological state of Experienced Meaningfulness of the Work (P). In this same way, Autonomy (I) leads to Experienced Responsibility (P). Also Feedback (I) from work leads to Knowledge of Actual Results (P). All of these P items lead to Outcomes (O) of High Internal Work Motivation, High Growth Satisfaction, High Job Satisfaction, and High Work Effectiveness.
— Note: there are moderators impacting the P of this model, such as stage of career, age, gender, etc.

III. Self-Regulating Work Groups: The community of practice is there to develop members’ capabilities and to build and exchange knowledge. The members who select themselves are involved and it’s held together by passion, commitment, and identification with the group’s expertise. It lasts as long as there is an interest in maintaining the group. The formal work group is there to deliver a product or service and everyone reports to the group’s manager. The group is held together via job requirements and common goals and is in place until the next reorg. A project team is there to accomplish a specified task and the employees are assigned by a senior manager. The group is held together by the project’s milestones and goals and is in place until the project is created. The informal network is there to collect or pass on business information, made up of friends and business acquaintances. It’s held together by mutual needs and is in place as long as people have a reason to connect.

To start and sustain a community of practice, one should (1) identify potential communities of practice that will enhance the company’s strategic abilities (identify the domain of expertise); (2) Provide the infrastructure that will support such communities and enable them to apply their expertise effectively. (IT systems, official sponsors or support teams, rewards); (3) Use non-traditional ways to assess the value of the company’s communities of practice (collect stories).

IDEO: enlightened trial and error succeeds over the lone genius. Innovated a shopping cart. They began by discussing facets: safety (22,000 hospitalized per year). Then went to the field and interviewed users (many with kids, watched behaviors – like people don’t let go of the cart, asked the guy who picks up the carts – they’ve been clocked going 35 mph). Then they put all ideas on a wall and vote with colored post-its.

Conditions that support change from the bottom:

  • When the task is complex and requires insight from org members
  • When the environment is dynamic and changes to products and services are needed
  • When quality and innovation is at a premium
  • When org members are mindful and engage in constant adaptation

Some weaknesses of approaching change from the bottom up:

  • When human capital is lost, performance can decline
  • Participation by uninformed, unskilled, and unmotivated workers does not enhance org change
  • It requires an investment of money and time to encourage participation and empowerment
  • Rhetoric about empowered participation without action breeds cynicism and conformity
  • Change depends on top management’s willingness to build the skills and knowledge of org members

Ralph Strayer’s Guide to Improving Performance:

  1. People want to be great. If they aren’t, it’s because management won’t let them be.
  2. Performance begins with each individual’s expectation. Influence what people expect and you influence how people perform.
  3. Expectations are driven partly by goals, vision, symbols, semantics, and partly by the context in which people work, that is, by things as compensation systems, production practices, and decision-making structures.
  4. The actions of managers shape expectations.
  5. Learning is a process, not a goal. Each new insight creates a new layer of potential insights.
  6. The organization’s results reflect me and my performance.

To make the degree of delegation work, there needs to be:
– Clear objectives
– A willingness of the boss to give up authority and direct exercise of power
– Willingness of the people in the org to buy-in
– Very good information and control systems so that individual activities can be measured
– Staff and managers that see themselves in supportive roles
– Great clarity in procedures
– Congruent incentives
– Skill, expertise down the line
– Trust in the leader

Class 7, 3/7: Leading Change – Creating a Vision and Establishing Urgency
Class Lecture Slides 07

Change as a transition state:
Current State -> Transition State -> Desired Future State

Must think about context in change.
Change Context -> Implementation Strategy -> Change Outcomes

Think of context of change in two ways: (1) Reactive Change: closing a performance gap (what is and what should be). (2) Proactive Change: closing an opportunity gap (what is and what could be)

Three Org Change Phases:

  1. Mobilization phase: make the case for change and build the org capacity for change
  2. Movement phase: build momentum, preserve and continue to build org capacity for change
  3. Sustain phase: institutionalize change initiative

To make the case for change:
– Benchmarking (comparing to others)
– Show opportunities for growth
– Basically, want to create discomfort in current situation to encourage change

Kotter’s 8 Steps:

  • Establish a sense of urgency
  • Formatting a powerful guiding coalition
  • Creating vision
  • Communicating a vision
  • Empowering others to act on the vision
  • Planning for and creating short-term wins
  • Consolidating improvements and producing still more change
  • Institutionalizing new approaches

Mobilization (Unfreeze) -> Movement (Change) -> Sustain (Refreeze)

Effective Change Management:
– Motivating Change
– Creating Vision
– Mobilizing Commitment
– Managing the Transition
– Sustaining Momentum

Barriers to Motivating Change:
– Direct Costs
– Saving Face
– Fear of the Unknown
– Breaking Routines
– Incongruent Systems
– Incongruent Team Dynamics

Creating a Vision: First, discover and describe the org’s core ideology. What are the core values that inform members what is important in the org? What is the org’s core purpose or reason for being? Second, construct the envisioned future. What are the bold and valued outcomes? What is the desired future state?

What makes a good vision? Must be desirable, feasible, relevant, and communicable. To be desirable, must satisfy stakeholders and inspire employees. To be feasible, there must be an opportunity for short term wins and a realistic stretch. To be relevant, it must be contextually sensitive. To be communicable, it must be clear, concise, and understandable.

What makes visions fail?
– Failing to focus
– Sitting out the dance
– Skipping the skill building
– Mismatching message and metrics
– Clashing powers
– Neglecting the talent pipeline

Phases to Enabling a Vision

  1. Framing the agenda: frame the org’s challenges as compelling stories that created urgency for action
  2. Engaging the org: distribute “ownership” broadly
  3. Building mission-critical capabilities: develop necessary capabilities
  4. Connecting the dots by creating alignment: align systems, mind-sets, messages
  5. Energizing the org through power of the people: make a link between talent requirements and competitive capability requirements. Keep people energized

Rhetorical Crafting: a leader’s ability to use symbolic language to give emotional power to his or her message. Examples: metaphors, analogies, stories, speech (repetition, rhythm, balance, alliteration), and language (make language fit the audience)

Transactional Leader: uses a carrot and a stick
Transformational Leader: inspires

Stretch Goals: BHAG (big, hairy audacious goals) is a part of envisioning the future. Is clearly articulated and is reachable within 10-30 years. Can be qualitative or quantitative. David vs. Goliath thinking. Be like an iconic role model. Internal transformation.

With managing the transition, need Activity Planning which is the roadmap for change. Need Commitment Planning which determines whose support is needed, where they stand, and how to influence their behavior. Need Change-Management Structures which is knowing the appropriate arrangement of people and power to drive the change.

When developing political support: assess change agent power, identify key stakeholders, and influence stakeholders. Need to know the social network.

Sources of power and power strategies for change agents
– (individual source of power) Knowledge: (power strategy) playing it straight
– (individual source of power) Others’ Support: (power strategy) using social networks
– (individual source of power) Personality: (power strategy) getting around the formal system

Sustaining Momentum: provide resources for change; build a support system for change agents; develop new competencies and skills; reinforce new behaviors; stay the course

Sustainability: meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

Three Pillars of Sustainability

  1. Economic sustainability: a company cannot survive if expenditure exceeds income
  2. Social sustainability: embodies the humanitarian context of business and related to issues of poverty, income inequality, and disease
  3. Environmental sustainability: considers impact of business on the quality and quantity of natural resources, the environment, global warming, ecological concerns, waste management, reductions in energy, alternative energy production and improved pollution and emissions management

Learning about Sustainability:
1. Codes of Conduct: minimum acceptable standards in corporate processes and procedures
2. Impact Measures: calculating not only financial standards, but social and environmental impact
3. Structures and Policies: designing company structures and policies that embody the principles of economic, social, and environmental sustainability (e.g. corporate governance or decision making
4. Purchasing and Supply Chain Innovations: dialogue about sustainability in the supply chain, along with human rights practices that foster well-being
5. Communications and Dialogue: means to communicate the importance of sustainability internally across the org and externally to stakeholders
6. Employee Training and Dialogue (should be ongoing): train and teach methods of sustainability

Four Articles Highlighting the Process of Institutionalizing Sustainability…

Marvis & Googins (2006): see the primary phase as elementary, engaged, innovative, integrative, and transformative. The persistence indicators: citizen concept, strategic intent, leadership, structure, issues management, stakeholder relations, transparency. The drivers of change: challenges, credibility, capacity, coherence, and commitment.

Werbach (2008): see the primary phase as blind, aware, compliant, then transparent. The persistence indicator: role of media transparency. The driver of change: strategic implementation.

Zadek (2004): see the primary phase as defensive, compliant, managerial, strategic, civil, then maturity pers. The persistence indicator: maturity of perspective. The drivers of change: market forces and org learning.

Goodman & Dean (1982): see the primary phase as n/a. The persistence indicators: knowledge, performance, preference, normative & value, and consensus. The drivers of change: congruence, socialization, rewards, diffusion, and sensing & calibrating.

When do you know that sustainability is institutionalized?
1. Codes of Conduct
2. Impact Measures
3. Structures and Policies
4. Purchasing and Supply Chain Initiatives
5. Communications and Dialogue
6. Employee Training and Dialogue (should be ongoing)

OD Midterm Review

Class 9, 3/28: Human Processes
Class Lecture Slides 09

Toxicity in Organizations
– Pain can be caused at work from a variety of sources: abusive bosses, budget pressures, or unexpected traumas
– Although emotional pain is inevitable at work, the aim is to make sure that it does not become or stay toxic
– The challenge is to help leaders create workplaces that are positive and healthy
– Sometimes pain can be a force for change that can lead to improving the quality of life and boost performance

Process Consultation: the creation of a relationship that permits the client to perceive, understand, and act on the process events. It is an approach that helps people and groups help themselves.

Factors facilitating toxic work environments:
– Radical change
– Fear
– Competition over scarce resources
– Personality differences
– Fear of losing a job
– Certain peaks during the year: finals, industry deadlines

Outcomes from Toxicity:
– Turnover
– Absenteeism
– Physical illness
– Reduced commitment and effort
– Contagion

Core Assumption: Toxicity is inevitable. (90% see incivility as a worsening problem. 50% of 327 front line workers indicate mistreatment in the last 3 years. 1/3 or more than 600 nurses experienced verbal abuse in the previous 5 days of work. All leaders, good and bad, create toxins. The good ones know how to support toxic handlers.)

Toxicity is handled through: (1) a toxic handler (another person who serves as a buffer to the toxicity); (2) directly dealing with the pain and toxicity at work.

Toxic Handlers:

  • Help to carry the burden of what is caused by the toxic employee/situation
  • Are empathetic to others who are suffering
  • Help talented people to work past toxic pain/experiences to accomplish their work
  • Serve as a translator between toxic bosses who deliver rude or disrespectful messages by reframing them for others

Individual Toxic Handler Interventions:
– Aimed at helping people better communicate with others
– Johari Windo
– Activities that focus on interpersonal conflicts within the org
– Interventions help involved parties interact with each other directly, facilitating diagnosis of the conflict and its resolution

Corrosive Connection: connections with others at work that are often characterized by low regard, disablement, or distrust

Challenges in dealing with corrosive connections:
– Pressures to deny or suppress
– Tendency to put blame on a person
– Instigator is clueless about the effects
– Limited resources for dealing with corrosivity, yet effects can be damaging

Typology of strategies to directly deal with corrosive connections:

  1. Bound and Buffer: create distance or interdependence (it doesn’t alter the cause of the problem)
  2. Buttress and Strengthen: build the capacity to bear emotional weight of corrosive connections (watch out for health and emotional problems)
  3. Target and Transform: alter the root cause of corrosivity through a process (mediation, renegotiation) – this is the most work and the most risky strategy

Johari Window: a model where things not in front of the open window are known and unknown to self and others

Group Process Consultation and Interventions

Group Process Issues Addressed by Process Consultation:
– Communications
– The functional roles of group members
– Group problem solving and decision making
– Group norms
– Leadership and authority

Group process interventions: aimed at the process, content, or structure of the group

Major intergroup interventions: resolving intergroup conflict

Resolving Intergroup Conflict:

  • Groups and consultant convene to address issues
  • Groups are asked to address three questions: (1) What qualities/attributes best describe our group? (2) What qualities/attributes best describe their group? (3) How do we think the other group will describe us?
  • Groups exchange and clarify answers
  • Groups analyze the discrepancies and work to understand their contribution to the perceptions
  • Groups discuss discrepancies and contributions
  • Groups work to develop action plans on key areas

Group Decision Making:
– Define the problem
– Identify the criteria
– Weigh the criteria
– Generate solution alternatives
– Rate each alternative on each criterion
– Determine the optimal solution

Facilitating the condition for positive interaction…

– Team meetings are ideal settings for members to protect their claims to knowledge, to defend approaches, and to maintain their position of “power” in the org hierarchy.

– Aim to give equal “air time” to different parties represented in the team.

– Stop value judgments that members make of one another’s suggestions immediately, facilitating a “safe” space to make knowledge contributions.

Prior to launching the first meeting…

– Carefully compose a team by meeting with individuals beforehand to understand their unique perspectives and objectives.

– Aim to create balanced representation and include “boundary spanners” to bridge groups.

– Identify smaller problem areas that link experts together to make goals clear and work manageable.

– Informal and formal leaders exist in every science team – discuss opportunities for shared leadership in order to make roles and responsibilities clear.

– Establish group norms early that foster effective team process.

Class 10, 4/4 Work Design & Technostructural Change Interventions
Class Lecture Slides 10
Class Lecture Slides 10 (most current)

Three Goals of Structure

  1. Efficiency: minimize costs, time, effort
  2. Coordination: coordinate diverse org tasks; ease info flow
  3. Adaptability/Flexibility: scan environment; change to meet environmental needs

Structural Design Dimensions of Orgs

Structural Differentiation: How are activities divided?
– Vertical differentiation (hierarchy of authority)
– Horizontal differentiation (specialization, e.g. product, process, function, geography)
– Complexity (number of activities or subsystems)

Integration: How are activities coordinated/linked?
– Centralization (hierarchical level of decision making)
– Span of control (number of products, processes, functions supervised)
– Formalization (amount of written documentation)
– Standardization (degree similar work is done in a uniform manner)

Issues of Differentiation of Subsystems
– Differences in time orientation (Ex: R&D can take years; Marketing new projects more frequently)
– Differences in objectives (Ex: data analytics want a movie that makes $$; creatives want expression)
– Differences in interpersonal orientation (Ex: business students dif personality than HR students)
– Differences in formal structure

Structural Integrating Mechanisms

Formalization: rules, policies, and procedures. More formalization coordinates by specifying roles and responsibilities or how different subunits will interact. Ex: job descriptions, operations manuals

Centralization: levels at which decisions are made. Centralized decision-making coordinates by concentrating decisions under one person. Ex: CEO has to sign for expenses over $1,000.

Spans of Control: number of subordinates or activities supervised. Larger spans of control are more integrating because responsibility is grouped under one person. Ex: Sales and marketing in the same sub-unit.

Standardization: standardized inputs, outputs, or processes. Increases predictability, reducing the need for coordination. Ex: TQM.

Co-location: different units are located in the same physical space. Physical co-location increases the likelihood of informal interaction.

Non-Structural Integrating Mechanisms

Liaison Roles: assign responsibility for inter-unit communication and coordination to specific people. Making someone directly accountable for coordination will ensure boundary-spanning interaction.

Teams: groups made up of people from multiple business units. Regular meetings btwn ppl from dif bus units increases communication and coordination. Ex: cross-functional product development team.

Culture: cultural propensity for sharing info, balanced power btwn sub-units. Unified culture can facilitate coordination across different business units. Ex: SW Airlines gate turnovers

Info Systems: who has access to the info? Increased access to info increases coordination through awareness of situations. Ex: Intranet knowledge bases.

Cross-training, Internal Job Mobility: employees have experiences in multiple business units. Experience in multiple jobs enables coordination through better understanding of other sub-unit’s issues and personal contacts. Ex: management development programs.

Vertical Linkages: degree of vertical coordination and control required. Can be low capacity links like rules and plans or high, like adding new positions to the hierarchy)

Horizontal Linkages: degree of horizontal coordination and control required. Can be low costs of coordination, like direct contact or high, like adding new tasks forces or teams.

Org Design is Important Because…
– Resources are aligned or misaligned with strategy and priorities
– Coordination is efficient or inefficient – resource use is optimized or resources are wasted
– Performance capabilities are enabled or disabled – quality, speed, innovation, growth
– Work is hard or easy to do – people are frustrated or feel well-utilized
– Customer interfaces are effective or ineffective – high value is delivered or not
– Human capital is developed, motivated, and retained or stagnates, becomes cynical and departs
– Societies, communities, and ecologies are strengthened or depleted

Designing orgs is the process of purposefully configuring the elements of the org to foster the achievement of valued business, customer, and employee, community, and environmental outcomes.

Look at the design at all systems levels: business unit, team/work/work process unit, inter-unit, corporate/system wide, inter-organizational.

Orgs are designed to fit a context, not a recipe

Review of Star Model — strategy informs: people, work processes, structure, rewards, and management processes — which in turn informs behavior and leads to performance and culture.

So in terms of self-design and the star model, look at — laying the foundation (valuing, acquiring knowledge, diagnosing) to criteria to designing to implementation and assessment. It all loops back to strategy.

Hierarchical structure is necessary but insufficient in a dynamic and complex environment.

Image of a team-based org in the slide, showing the overlap

Common Aims of Internal Restructuring
Enhance flow of information and expertise across org boundaries to increase: learning, catching mistakes, innovation, efficiency, shared understanding, coordination

Implement the Internal Restructuring:
– Over-communicate honestly
– Align goals with the restructuring efforts
– Avoid the creation of bottle-necks that require certain people to be brokers
– Involve employees in the process and take their input into account
– Create a climate that supports speaking up in order to enhance the flow of info resources across org boundaries

Downsizing = Layoffs + Restructuring. More than 3 mil people laid off every year. It can happen even during prosperous times. When deciding who to keep, try to figure out which departments and people matter and protect them. Be ready to adjust work processes now that there are fewer people to accomplish the work. Be mindful of how it will affect customers and their expectations.

When announcing a downsizing, use it as a last resort. Be clear about short and long term goals. Communicate rationale and allow for Q&A. Involve senior management and let everyone know at the same time. Provide counseling at the location. Try not to make an announcement before the holidays or before the weekend.

When implementing the downsizing: (1) Over-communicate honestly. (2) Be fair (help victims find other jobs; senior management should share this burden; reduces likelihood of voluntary turnover). (3) Explain the selection process (focus on merit or future skill needs; fit this criterion with the vision for the future.

Involve employees. If you can’t offer job security, provide ways to enhance employability. (Training and development; link incentives in order to motivate skill development.)

Surviving org downsizing – this depends a great deal on the way survivors respond. If they support he change initiative, downsizing is perceived to meet its objectives. If they feel that the downsizing has violated them and their work environment, workers will tend to work against the objectives of downsizing. There is survivor guilt, so help people understand. It will reduce voluntary turnover in the future.

Book Rec, from an employee’s perspective: “Healing the Wounds (Noer, 2009)

Recs for Change SMA MEPD: increase integration by development product organization, communication, and decision-making systems. Communicate new project organization to division and R&D group, develop interpersonal competence, involve group relations through inter-group problem-solving meetings, more personal leadership.

SMA Lessons: structure should follow strategy; structure shapes interactions and accountability inside the org; linking mechanisms can compensate for mismatches, but only so far.

Class 11, 4/11: Organizational Lifecycle and Consulting
Class Lecture Slides 11

Partner Types: Mergers, Acquisitions, Joint Ventures

Partner Aims: To achieve the objectives of growth, diversification, economies of scale, synergy or a global presence

Barriers to Successful Partnerships: Geographic distance, language barriers, cultural differences

Historical Perspective

1960-1970s: Conglomerate type that involved partnering with an organization in an unrelated field. The focus was on financial and planning systems at the corp level with operations being conducted separately. The need for cultural integration was low.

1980-1990s: Greater number of partnerships between orgs in the same field of business activity or industry (ie: Time Warner & AOL). The need for cultural integration was high.

To get a successful partnership, prospect search and identify, do your due diligence, negotiations, transition management, view ops as an integrated unit.

M&A Lessons: No partnership of equals. Avoid arrogance. Change is inevitable, culture matters, two-way and open communication, view employees as assets, not liabilities, employee involvement, overestimate timing.

Notes from Dick Strayer’s Slides

Life Cycle Analysis: A Systems Approach

Services Strayer Offers:
– Team Building (new teams, teams in conflict, matrix management, team restructuring, board development)
– Organizational Change Management (org change planning, strategic planning facilitation, org change road map)
– Acquisitions Integration (integration model, team consolidation, culture integration, acquisition integration)
– Executive Development (self-assessment, feedback, development plan, coaching)

Flamholtz: Organization Life Cycles
– New Venture
– Expansion
– Consolidation
– Professionalism

Stages of Organizational Evolution (Growing Pains: Transitioning from an entrepreneurship to a professionally managed firm by Eric Flamholtz): (1) Identify and define a market; (2) Develop products and services; (3) Acquire resources; (4) Develop operational systems; (5) Develop management systems; (6) Manage the corporate culture.

Start Up Life Cycles: Key Stages

Early Entrepreneurial Stage:
– Lots of grandiose vision/no real strategy
– No processes, systems, structure, little role delineation
– Founder Group dominance

Later Entrepreneurial Stage:
– Oozing strategy, no functional objectives
– Chaotic-overwhelmed
– Resource squeeze
– Constant change in roles
– Rebellion against beginning structure
– Culture derived from Founders

Early Professionalization Stage – and leading to Boredom Stage:
– IPO able leader
– Strategy of the quarter
– 90-day task implementation roadmap
– Roles stabilizing
– Processes/systems more defined
– Internal coordination and linkage evolving
– Culture defined by team

Lots more info, but the slides are a better resource…

Class 12, 4/18: Performance & Talent Management Interventions
Class Lecture Slides 12

A Performance Management Model:

Have “reward systems” (work place technology) and “goal setting” (employee involvement) tie into inform “individual and group performance” which is informed by the “performance appraisal.”

Characteristics of Effective Goals:
– Goals are challenging but realistic
– Set participatively
– Goals are clear and specific, operationally defined
– Resources for goal achievement are negotiated

Management By Objectives (MBO) attempts to align personal goals with business strategy through increased communications and shared perceptions between managers and subordinates. MBO programs may go beyond manager and subordinate roles to address individuals, work groups, and to reconcile conflicts.

Performance Appraisal Elements

  • Purpose
  • Appraiser
  • Role of Appraisee
  • Measurement
  • Training

In the Traditional Performance Appraisal, the purpose is organizational, legal, and it’s fragmented. The appraiser is the supervisor and the appraisee is a passive recipient. The measurements are subjective and concerned with validity. The timing is on a period, which is fixed, and administratively driven.

In High Involvement Performance Appraisals, the purpose is developmental and integrative. The appraiser is a combination of the appraisee, co-workers, and others. The appraisee is an active participant, measurements are objective and subjective. The timing is dynamic, timely, employee- or work-driven.

Performance Appraisal Application Stages:

  • Select the appropriate stakeholders
  • Diagnose the current situation
  • Establish the system’s purposes and objectives
  • Design the performance appraisal system
  • Experiment with implementation
  • Evaluate and monitor the system

Characteristics of Effective Appraisal Systems: timely, accurate, accepted by the users, understood, focused on critical control points, economically feasible.

Forced ranking system: shows top management, middle, and deadweight. Arguments both for and against a force ranking system. Yahoo got rid of forced ranking systems, but gives bonuses based on rank, so they essentially just shifted the system.

Reward System Design Features:

  • Person/Job Based vs. Performance Based: the extent to which rewards are based on the person, the job, or the outcomes of the work
  • Market Position (external equity): the relationship between what an organization pays and what other organizations pay
  • Internal Equity: the extent to which people doing similar work within an organization are rewarded the same
  • Hierarchy: the extent to which people in higher positions get more and varied rewards
  • Centralization: the extent to which reward system design, decisions, and administration are standardized
  • Rewards Mix: the extent to which different types of rewards are available and offered to people
  • Security: the extent to which work is guaranteed
  • Seniority: the extent to which rewards are based on length of servce

Characteristics of Effective Reward Systems: availability, timeliness, performance contingency, durability, equity, and visibility.

Types of Rewards:
– Pay: (1) skill-based pay plans; (2) performance-based pay systems (pay linked to performance); (3) gain sharing (paying bonuses based on improvements in the operating results)
– Promotions
– Benefits

Performance Appraisals evaluate an employee’s current and potential levels of performance to allow managers to make objective human resource decisions. They also let the workers know how they are doing and what they can do better. They provide the basis for distributing rewards. They also help the organization monitor selection, training, and development activities.

Common Evaluation Techniques:
(1) Objective Methods: basis is a measurable quantity (units of output, sales volume, number of defective products)
(2) Judgmental Methods: managerial estimates of employee performance levels; ranking (ordering employees from best to worst – difficult to use because there is no absolute standard and differences in performance of ranked employees is not apparent)
(3) Rating: using a predetermined scale (standard) to evaluate each employee’s performance

Before a company sends managers out to do appraisals, do some interview prep. Some questions to consider:
– Can you make cause-effect linkages between your subordinates’ strengths and weaknesses and tangible outcomes?
– How often and to what extent have you intervened in your subordinates’ areas of responsibility?
– To what extent are your own actions a source of your subordinates’ problems?
– What diagnosing performance are you able to identify root causes (motivation, ability, resources)?
– What are your subordinates’ limitations that cannot be corrected? (move them out of job or retain them?)
– On what strengths can your subordinate capitalize to further increase their effectiveness?

Avoiding Appraisal Errors:
– Use the entire evaluation instrument; avoid focusing on one portion
– Don’t let an employee’s poor performance in one area influence the evaluation of other areas of performance
– Evaluate the entire performance period and not the most recent behaviors of the employee
– Guard against any form of personal bias or discrimination in the evaluation

Common Feedback Errors:
– Focusing on the person, rather than the behaviors
– Overwhelming the person with a laundry list of areas to improve, rather than focusing on a select few
– Focusing on what you don’t want, rather than on what you do want
– Being hurtful while claiming to just be “honest”
– Leaving the discussion with vague goals
– Not making the feedback timely or frequent

Coaching and Mentoring
Goals: assist in the execution of a transition, address a performance problem, develop new behavioral skills with leadership development
Application Stages: establishes the principles of the relationship, conduct an assessment, coach and client debrief the results, develop and implement an action plan, and assess the results

Behavioral Coaching: 360 Feedback, before you begin…
– If the person you’re coaching is not willing to make a sincere effort to change… behavioral coaching will only work if the manager you are coaching is willing to make the needed commitment.
– If the person has been written off by the company… sometimes, organizations are really just documenting a case to get rid of someone. If that’s the case, don’t bother going through this process.
– If the person lacks the intelligence or functional skills to do the job… if a manager does not have the capacity or experience required, don’t expect behavioral coaching to help.
– If the organization has the wrong mission… behavioral coaching is a “how to get there” process, not a “where to go” process. If the organization is headed in the wrong direction, behavioral coaching will not make it change course.

360 Feedback: An Overview
– Clarify the purpose for every member of the organization
– Clarify rater anonymity, accountability, and selection
– Prepare participants
– Review and interpret feedback results
– Develop an action plan
– Follow-up

360 Feedback: Steps
– Identify attributes for the manager you are coaching. Once you’ve determined the behavioral characteristics of a successful manager in a given position— such things as accessibility to colleagues, recognition of others, and listening—ask that manager if he or she agrees that these are the right kinds of behaviors.
– Determine who can provide meaningful feedback. Key stakeholders may include direct reports, peers, customers, suppliers, or members of the management team. Strive for a balanced mix that does not stack the deck for or against the manager, and gain agreement that these are the appropriate reviewers.
– Collect feedback. Assessment is often best handled in a written, anonymous
survey, compiled by an outside party into a summary report and given directly to the manager. Analyze results. Talk with the manager about the results of his or her peers’ feedback. The manager may choose not to disclose individual stakeholders’ comments or numerical scores. Discuss the manager’s key strengths and areas for improvement.
– Develop an action plan. The most helpful and appreciated outcome of any assessment is specific advice. Developing “alternatives to consider” (rather than mandates) should not be difficult. If, for example, you asked the manager to suggest things you could do to be a better listener, you would probably receive a pretty good list, such as: don’t interrupt people; paraphrase what they say; make eye contact; pause five seconds before responding to their remarks; recognize that the problem isn’t figuring out what to do; the problem is doing it; and focus on one or two key behaviors and develop a few action steps to improve each.
– Have the manager respond to stakeholders. The manager being reviewed should talk with each member of the review team and collect additional suggestions on how to improve on the key areas targeted for improvement.
– Develop an ongoing follow-up process. Within three or four months conduct a two- to six-item mini-survey with the original review team. Respondents should be asked whether the manager has become more or less effective in the areas targeted for improvement.
– Review results and start again. If the manager has taken the process seriously, stakeholders almost invariably report improvement. Build on that success by repeating the process quarterly for the next twelve to eighteen months. This type of follow-up will assure continued progress on initial goals and uncover additional areas for improvement.

Class 13, 4/25 Managing Workforce Diversity
Class Lecture Slides 13